THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES & MINORITY AFFAIRS
(SHRI VINCENT H. PALA)
(a) Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal (KWDT II) has submitted its report and decision on
30.12.2010.
(b) Based on an yearly water series for 47 years, KWDT II determined Yield at 75%
dependability, Yield at 65% dependability and Average Yield as 2173 TMC, 2293 TMC and 2578
TMC respectively. KWDT II decided that the water of river Krishna be distributed amongst the
three States of Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh on 65% dependability i.e. 2293 TMC.
However the allocations already made by KWDT-I (headed by Shri Justice (Retd) R.S.Bachawat)
at 75% dependability have not be disturbed. KWDT II has allocated 628TMC, 799TMC and 850TMC
to States of Maharastra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh respectively and the remaining 16 TMC
for meeting minimum flow requirement in the river Krishna at 65% dependability. KWDT II has
also allocated 663TMC, 904TMC and 995TMC to States of Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra
Pradesh respectively on average basis. KWDT II places restriction on the State of Maharastra
for utilization of water from Bhima, Upper Krishna sub basins, diversion out of basin except
from Upper Krishna sub basin and from entire Krishna basin; on the State of Karnataka for
utilization of water from Tungbhadra sub basin, Upper Krishna project and from entire Krishna
basin; and on the State of Andhra Pradesh from entire Krishna basin(It includes further
allocation of 9 TMC for Jurala Project, 25 TMC for Telugu Ganga Project and 150 TMC for
carry over storage in Srisailam and Nagarjunasagar Dams). KWDT II gave liberty to the State
of Andhra Pradesh to utilize the remaining water available(above 2578 TMC), subject to any
part of it being stored/ trapped in future and/or till the next review or reconsideration by
any Competent Authority under the law. At any time after 31st May, 2050, order may be reviewed
or revised by a Competent Authority or Tribunal. KWDT II has framed a scheme called âKrishna
Waters Decision âImplementation Boardâ, for implementation of its decision and the decision
and directions made by KWDT-I, which have not been modified or reviewed by it.
(c) Yes.The Government is aware of the resentment expressed in certain quarters.
(d) & (e) No review petition has been filed by the Government of Andhra Pradesh before the
Tribunal for modification of award so far.