THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE (SHRI BALASAHEB ViKHE PATH):
(a) to (c) In the matter of Delhi High Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India the
Deihi High Court vide its order dated 10.3.1995 had declared the Recovery of Debts due
to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (DRT Act) as unconstitutional and void
inter alia on the grounds that the Act does not contain provision for set off, counter
claim or transfer of cases from one tribunal to another. Government filed an SLP in the
Supreme Court and the Supreme Court stayed he operation ot the order of Delhi High Court.
During various hearings of the case before the Supreme Court`one major observation made by
the court pertained to carry out necessary amendments to DRT Act. Reserve Bank of India
also set up a Working Group to suggest changes in the Act to make it more effective.
Based on observations of the Supreme Court, recommendations made by RBI Working Group,
Rajya Sabha Committee on Subordinate Legislation the Act has been amended suitably through
an Ordinance dated 17.1.2000. Some of these amendments are as under:â
(1) set-off and counter-claims, appointment of Receivers and Commissioners by the
Tribunal, transfer of cases from one Tribunal to anotherand appointment of more than one
Recovery Officer in a Tribunal;
(2) empowering the Tribunals to issue certificate for recovery of enhanced or reduced
amount on the basis of the final order of the Appellate Tribunal;
(3) empowering the Chairperson of the Appellate Tribunal to appraise the work of
Presiding Officers of Tribunals and discharge functions of the Chairperson of another
Appellate Tribunal;
(4) the transfer of recovery certificate from one Tribunal to another Tribunal
to facilitate recovery;
(5) empowering the Tribunals to distribute sale proceeds among the secured creditors
in accordance with the provisions of section 529 of the Companies Act.