(a) whether the Supreme Court held the UTI responsible for the
small investors of UTI not receiving their maturity amount for
their units in September, 2005 and has also directed that it
should again re-issue cheques to such investors for their
maturity amount;
(b) if so, whether U.T.I. has sent cheques of maturity amount
to investors for their units in compliance with the orders of
the Supreme Court;
(c) if so, the details thereof;
(d) if not, the reasons for delay in this regard; and
(e) the time by which cheques of maturity amount to investors
for their units are likely to be sent by UTI?