THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES(SHRI VINCENT H. PALA)
(a) to (c) The mechanism for settlement of water disputes is
available in the form of Inter-State River Water Disputes (ISRWD)
Act, 1956 which provides for settlement of disputes by
negotiations failing which referring such dispute to a tribunal
for adjudication. The ISRWD Act, 1956 has been amended in the
year 2002 whereby the adjudication of the water disputes by the
tribunal has been made time-bound.
(d) As per the ISRWD Act, 1956, the water dispute arises among
two or more State Governments when the Central Government receives
request under Section 3 of the Act from any of the basin State
with regard to existence of water dispute. The details of the
present inter-State water disputes under ISRWD Act, 1956 are as
follows:
S.No. River/Rivers States concerned Date of Date of Reference to Reference the Central to the Government Tribunal
1. Ravi & Punjab,Haryana and ____ April,1986 Beas Rajasthan
2. Cauvery Kerala,Karnataka, July,1986 June, 1990 Tamil Nadu and Pudducherry
3. Krishna Karnataka,Andhra September, April, 2004 Pradesh and 2002â Maharashtra January,2003
4. Madei/Mo Goa,Karnataka and July,2002 - ndovi/Ma Maharashtra hadayi
5. Vansadha Andhra Pradesh & February,2006 - ra Orissa
The Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) submitted report
and decision under section 5(2) of the ISRWD Act, 1956 on
5.2.2007.Party States and Central Government have sought
guidance/clarification from the tribunal under section 5(3) of
the Act.The tribunal has not submitted its further report to the
Government.Further,party States have also filed Special Leave
Petition(SLP) in Honâble Supreme Court against the report and
decision of the tribunal as mentioned above. The Krishna Water
Disputes Tribunal passed orders on Interim Relief Applications of
the States on 9.6.2006.
The water dispute related to Ravi & Beas was referred to the
Ravi & Beas Waters Tribunal (RBWT) in 1986 under Section 14 of the
said Act.RBWT submitted its report on 30.1.1987 under section
5(2) of the Act.Party States and Central Government have sought
explanation/guidance under section 5(3) of the Act from the
Tribunal.The Tribunal has not submitted its further report to
the Government.
In respect of Mahadayi/Mandovi River Water Disputes raised by
Government of Goa, the Ministry of Water Resources is of the
opinion that water dispute contained in the request of Government
of Goa cannot be settled by negotiation. Meanwhile, the
Government of Goa filed a suit in the Supreme Court for setting up
of Water Dispute Tribunal for adjudication of above River Water
Dispute and an Interlocutory Application (IA) for stay in
construction activity in September 2006.
In respect of Vansadhara Water Dispute, the Honâble Supreme
Court vide order dated 06.02.2009 directed the Central Government
to constitute the tribunal within a period of six months. As the
work of constitution of tribunal is time consuming, the Ministry
of Water Resources has prayed Honâble Supreme Court to grant a
further period of six months to constitute the tribunal beyond the
time stipulated in the above orders.