(a) whether National Oiganisation of Bank Workers has urged the Government to restore
compassionate appointment in Nationalised Banks;
(b) if so, the details thereof; and
(c) the reaction of the Government thereto?
(a) whether National Oiganisation of Bank Workers has urged the Government to restore
compassionate appointment in Nationalised Banks;
(b) if so, the details thereof; and
(c) the reaction of the Government thereto?
MINISTER OF THE STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE (SHRI PAWAN KUMAR BANSAL)
(a) & (b) : Yes, Sir. IBA had earlier reported that the United Forum of Bank Unions demanded
for restoration of compassionate appointment scheme in banks in its original form without any
condition as regards economic criteria etc. and dispense with the scheme of cash compensation.
( c ) :- The Hon`ble Supreme Court, in the case of Umesh Kumar Nagpal Vs. the State of Haryana
(JT J994 (3) SC 525), in 1994, has, inter-alia, held that as a rule, appointment in the public
services should be made strictly on the basis of open invitation of application and merit. In
implementation of the norms laid down by the Hon`ble Supreme Court, a Model Scheme for payment
of ex-gratia (lump-sum amount) in_Ji£U_fif compassionate appointment was circulated by the
Indian Banks` Association (IBA) to all the public sector banks (PSBs) on 31.07.2004 which has
since been adopted by 27 PSBs. The above issue was never a matter for discussion/negotiation
at the industry level. The scheme is a non-statutory one and as such, is not enforceable. It
also does not form part of service conditions and cannot be claimed as a matter of right by
any employee. None of the rights of the employees is violated by the banks by switching over
to a scheme of monetary assistance mJjejLfif appointment on compassionate grounds and therefore,
no industrial dispute can lie in the matter.