with reference to the reply given to parts (e) to (h) on Unstarred Question No. 931 dated December 7, 2004 and state:
(a) whether the information has since been collected;
(b) if so, the details thereof and action taken;
(c) if not, the reasons for the delay in the collection of the information; and
(d) the time by which the information is likely to be collected?
MINISTER OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT( SHRI GHULAM NABI AZAD )
(a)to(d): The information has since been received. DDA has
reported that Hon`ble Delhi High Court vide order dated
22.9.2004 in CWP No. 6324/2003 - Residents Welfare Association,
Pocket A-14, Kalkaji Extension versus DDA & Another-imposed
costs of Rs.20,000/- on DDA and Rs.5000/- on MCD. The Court
directed to remove all encroachments in Kalkaji Extension, stop
the use of the site as a school and restore it as a green area
and withdraw proposal for change in land use. DDA has already
been permitted to withdraw said proposal for change in land use.
Subsequently, Court in CWP No. 6916-33/05 has recalled its
orders dated 22.9.2004 pending further hearing in the matter.
The matter is sub-judice.
DDA has also reported that Hon`ble Supreme Court orders
dated 18.3.1996 in Civil Appeal No. 7933/1995 in the matter
G.N. Khajuria and others versus DDA & Others were to the effect
that it was not possible to pinpoint the actual person
responsible for the alleged deviation and, therefore, the matter
was closed. Thus no further action pursuant to those Supreme
Court orders is required to be taken by DDA.