MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) FOR WOMEN AND CHILD
DEVELOPMENT (SHRIMATI RENUKA CHOWDHURY)
(a),(b),(c),(d)&(e) A Statement is laid on the Table of the House.
STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PART (a),(b),(c),(d)&(e) OF LOK
SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 364 FOR 22.8.2006 BY SHRI BHARTRUHARI
MAHTAB AND SHRI PARSURAM MAJHI REGARDING ICDS FOR NORTH EASTERN
STATES
(a) Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) is a Centrally-
sponsored Scheme which, inter-alia, aims at improving the
nutritional and health status of children below 6 years of age. The
Scheme is being implemented in all the States/UTs, including North
Eastern (NE) States and Scheduled Areas, in the country.
Out of the 5652 ICDS Projects sanctioned till 31.3.2003, 4531
Projects were in rural areas, 763 in tribal areas and 358 in urban
(slum) areas of the country. North Eastern States account for 440 of
these 5652 projects. Government has sanctioned 466 more ICDS
Projects in the year 2005-06, out of which 257 are in rural areas,
46 in tribal areas and 163 in urban areas. Out of these 466
projects, 72 are in the North Eastern States. Similarly, out of 7.58
lakh AWCs sanctioned by the Government of India upto 31.3.2003,
42999 AWCs were in the North Eastern States and out of 1.88 lakh
AWCs sanctioned by the Government in 2005-06, 11502 AWCs are in NE
States.
Also, in view of the special needs of the North Eastern States,
the Government sanctioned construction of Anganwadi Centres out of
Ministryâs budget earmarked for NE region, even though the Scheme
does not, generally, provide for this activity in other parts of the
country. Further, population norms for sanction of ICDS
Project and AWCs in sparsely populated tribal areas, are also lower
than those for other areas.
Thus the Government has taken necessary measures to ensure
adequate coverage of North Eastern States and Scheduled/Tribal Areas
under the ICDS Scheme.
A number of initiatives have also been taken by the Government
in the last two years or so to improve the effectiveness of the
scheme. Salient amongst them are : -
i) Doubling of financial norms for Supplementary Nutrition.
ii) Sharing of 50% cost of supplementary nutrition with the
States/UTs.
iii) BPL is no longer the criteria for selection of beneficiaries of
supplementary nutrition.
A number of Projects and Anganwadi Centres sanctioned before
31.3.2003 have become operational during the last two years or so
resulting in increase in number of beneficiaries as indicated below
:
No. of No. of No. of No. of pre-school operational operational beneficiaries education beneficiaries projects AWCs Supplementary nutrition
31.03.2004 5267 649307 415.08 lakh 204.38 lakh
31.03.2005 5422 706872 484.42 lakh 218.41 lakh
31.12.2005 5653 745943 546.71 lakh 237.64 lakh
(b) No such proposal is under consideration of the Government.
(c) Does not arise.
(d) No such proposal is under consideration of the Government.
(e) Does not arise.