THE MINISTER OF FINANCE (SHERI PRANAB MUKHERJEE)
(a) & (b): A statement is laid on the Table of the House.
STATEMENT FOR LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. 166 FOR 2nd DECEMBER, 2011 âCREDIT RISK
MANAGEMENT BY BANKSâ TABLED BY SHERI ARJUN RAY AND SHERI HUKUMDEV NARAYAN YADAV.
(a): In the recently released :Report on trend and Progress of Banking in India 2010-11â,
the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has stated that while gross Non-Performing Assets (NPAs),
in percentage terms, have declined steadily from 15.70 percent at end March 1997 to 2.25
percent at end March 2011, this does not fully reveal the underlying realities and some
trends are a matter of concern, which could put pressure on asset quality of banks in future.
Aggressive lending during the high credit growth phase followed by the crisis resulted in
slippage ratio steadily rising from 1.81 percent at end March 2008 to 2.21 percent at end
March 2010, followed by a slight moderation to 2.01 percent in March 2011. The concern is
that the recoveries have not kept pace with slippages since 2007-08. Rising interest rates
and substantial amount of restructuring done during the crisis period, if not done with due
care, are likely to put further pressure on asset quality of banks. Further, asset quality
of banks needs to be closely watched in the changing interest rate environment as the sticky
loan portfolio of small and medium enterprises might rise.
(b) & (c): The overall trends in NPAs presently do not indicate any systemic vulnerability.
Although, the gross NPAs (GNPAs), increased in absolute terms in 2010-11 over the previous
year, at a system level, the GNPA ratio of scheduled commercial banks still remains low
(2.25% as at March 31, 2011).
(d) & (e) Banks are already sensitized to closely watch the NPA position and t5he same is
also monitored regularly by the Government and RBI. Various measures, taken with regard to
NPA recovery, are presently considered to be sufficient.