Question : PROPOSAL FROM NGOS



(a) whether any proposal from Non-government Organisations has been approved under the Women and Child Development Scheme;

(b) if so, the total number of proposals from Non- government Organisations received during the last three years, year-wise and State-wise;

(c) the names alongwith the total number of the Non- government Organisations whose proposal have been accepted/rejected and are still lying pending till date; and

(d) the total amount allocated under sanctioned proposals during the said period?

Answer given by the minister


MINSITER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT (SHRIMATI KANTI SINGH)

(a) Yes, Sir.

(b)&(c) The number of proposals received from NGOs and approved during the last three years, year-wise and State- wise is at Annexure-I.

The details of the NGOs to whom funds were released State-wise and Scheme-wise for the last three years are available in the respective Annual Report of the Department and Department’s web site http://www.wcd.nic.in

(d) Scheme-wise and year-wise allocation made in Budget Estimates, Revised Estimates and Actual Expenditure, during the last three years is at Annexure-II.

Annexure-I

SUPPORT FOR TRAINING EMPLOYMENT AND PROGRAMME (STEP)
PROJECT PROPOSALS RECEIVED AND APPROVED

Proposals received Proposals approved

S.No.	Name of the	2002	2003	2004	2002-03	2003-04	2004-05	State
1.	Andhra Pradesh	4	10	4	-	- -
2.	Arunachal	4	8	12	Pradesh
3.	Assam	16	33	6 3	3 1
4.	Bihar	-	-	- -	- -
5.	Chattisgarh	-	-	- 1	- -
6.	Goa	-	-	-	-	- -
7.	Gujarat 3	3	34 -	- -
8.	Haryana 1	2	- -	- -
9.	Himachal 3	4	15	-	- -	Pradesh
10.	Jammu &	2	1	- -	- -	Kashmir
11.	Jharkhand	-	-	1 -	- -
12.	Karnataka 2	5	36 1	2 -
13.	Kerala 4	4	33 1	- 1
14.	Madhya Pradesh 2	2	9 -	- -
15.	Maharashtra 7	3	4 1	3 1
16.	Manipur 8	25	43 -	1 2
17.	Meghalaya -	-	1 -	- -
18.	Mizoram 1	7	1 1	- -
19.	Nagaland 8	13	78 1	2 -
20.	Orissa 7	3	5 3	- -
21.	Punjab 3	2	3 2	- -
22.	Rajasthan 1	10	33 2	1 -
23.	Sikkim 1	1	2 -	- -
24.	Tamil Nadu 4	1	6 -	- -
25.	Tripura 7	4	2 -	- -
26.	Uttaranchal 3	5	5 1	- -
27.	Uttar Pradesh	10 2	2 3	- -
28.	West Bengal -	5	21 1	- -	Union -	-	-	Territories
1.	A & Nicobar	-	-	-	Islands
2.	Chandigarh	-	-	-
3.	Dadra & Nagar -	-	-	Haveli
4.	Daman & Diu	-	-	-
5.	Delhi 3	-	-
6.	Lakshawdweep -	-	-
7	Pondicherry -	-	-	Total 104	153	356 21 12 5

SWAWLAMBAN SCHEME

Project Proposals received/Approved during the year 2002,2003 and 2004
2002 2003 2004
S.N Name of Rec. App. Rec. App. Rec. App. o. the State 1. Andhra 190 190 6 2 141 4 Pradesh 2. Assam 96 19 102 18 117 5 3. Manipur 55 31 95 22 327 15 4. Kerala 15 12 35 14 124 5 5. Karnataka 6 1 25 10 240 8 6. Nagaland 5 5 2 1 - - 7. West 88 70 26 13 289 25 Bengal 8. Maharashtra 21 9 83 25 147 12 9. Orissa 17 14 16 9 57 32 10. Gujarat - - 16 3 81 2 11. J&K 22 1 79 15 - - 12. Tamilnadu 26 14 62 10 57 4 13. Bihar - - - - 19 - 14. Haryana 18 2 28 17 46 12 15. Himachal - - 4 - 4 1 Pradesh 16. Madhya 181 37 10 - 89 14 Pradesh 17. Rajasthan - - 46 5 110 - 18. Punjab 17 - 17 6 52 2 19. Delhi - - - - 12 1 20. Uttar 519 137 208 69 5 1 Pradesh 21. Uttaranchal 17 1 38 17 63 10 22. Chhatisgarh - - 6 2 - - 23. Meghalaya - - 11 1 - - 24. Mizoram - - 44 - - - 25. Tripura - - 34 - 8 - 26. A.N. - - 10 - 6 - Islands 27. Arunachal - - 23 - 23 - Pradesh 28. Chandidgarh - - - - 4 - 29. Jharkhand - - - - 1 1 30. Goa - - - - 1 - 31. Sikkim - - - - 4 - Total 1293 543 1076 259 2027 153

SWADHAR SCHEME

PROPOSALS RECEIVED AND SANCTIONED DURING 2002-03 TO 2004-2005
S.No	Name of the State	2002-03	2003-04	2004-05	Prop. Sancd.	Prop.	Sancd. Prop. Sancd	Recd	Recd	Recd
1. Andhra Pradesh 3 1 4 21 10 2. Assam 12 3 13 2 3. Delhi 1 3 3 1 4. Gujrat 6 4 3 1 2 2 5. Haryana 3 1 6 6. Himachal Pradesh 3 7. Jammu & Kashmir 2 2 1 8. Karnataka 6 1 16 3 7 12 9. Kerala 3 1 10. Madhya Pradesh 2 1 2 11. Maharashtra 13 1 16 5 12. Mizoram 2 - 1 13. Manipur 7 18 1 10 9 14. Meghalaya 1 1 15. Nagaland 2 1 16. Orissa 10 10 1 30 20 17. Rajasthan 2 1 3 1 18. Tamilnadu 30 5 2 14 11 19 Triura 1 1 20. Uttar Pradesh 2 2 1 21. Uttaranchal 3 1 22. West Bengal 8 1 4 2 1 23. Chandigarh 1 Total 117 21 93 11 109 72


Scheme of Working Women’s Hostel
S.N	Name of	2002-03	2003-04	2004-05
o.	the State	Rec.	App.	Rec.	App.	Rec.	App.
1 Andhra 1 1 1 1 - - Pradesh 2 Assam - - - - 10 - 3 Chandigarh - - 1 1 - - 4 Haryana - - 1 1 1 - 5 Karnataka 2 2 2 2 2 - 6 Kerala 4 3 3 3 8 - 7 Madhya 1 1 - - 2 1 Pradesh 8 Maharashtra 4 4 2 1 1 - 9 Manipur - - - - 11 - 10 Mizoram - - 1 1 - - 11 Nagaland - - - - 29 - 12 Orissa - - - - 1 - 13 Punjab 1 1 - - - - 14 Tamil 4 3 3 3 1 1 Nadu 15 Uttar 3 3 - - 2 1 Pradesh 16 Uttaranchal 2 1 - - - - 17 West 2 2 2 - - - Bengal Total 24 21 14 13 68 3

Total Proposals received – 106
Total Proposals sanctioned - 37

SHORT STAY HOMES
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05
S.N Name of Rec. App. Rec. App. Rec. App. o. the State 1 Andhra 15 1 24 1 35 6 Pradesh 2 Assam 14 1 4 1 53 2 3 Manipur 1 0 3 0 19 2 4 Kerala 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Karnataka 3 0 13 3 25 5 6 Nagaland 2 1 1 0 8 0 7 West 3 0 7 5 10 0 Bengal 8 Maharashtra 17 2 26 5 1 1 9 Orissa 5 1 4 0 10 2 10 Gujarat 0 0 0 0 5 0 11 J & K 2 0 2 0 2 0 12 Tamil 22 12 27 11 8 2 Nadu 13 Bihar 47 9 0 0 0 0 14 Haryana 0 1 3 0 0 0 15 Himachal 1 1 0 0 1 0 Pradesh 16 Madhya 18 6 15 5 0 0 Pradesh 17 Rajasthan 4 0 12 0 22 1 18 Delhi 2 0 0 0 0 0 19 Uttar 62 5 4 0 3 1 Pradesh 20 Uttaranchal 0 0 0 1 0 0 21 Mizoram 1 1 2 0 3 0 22 Tripura 1 0 1 0 0 0 23 Chandigarh 0 0 1 0 0 0 24 Pondicherry 0 0 0 0 2 0
Total 220 41 149 32 207 22

CRECHE SCHEME
Sl.	Nameof	2002-03	2003-04	2004-05
No.	States
1.	Andhra	11	32	27	Pradesh
2.	Aurnachal	-	2	-	Pradesh
3.	Assam	16	15	5
4.	Bihar -	2	-
5.	Chattisgarh -	9	-
6.	Goa -	-	-
7	Gujrat 1	2	2
8.	Haryana 4	8	16
9.	Himachal -	1	-	Pradesh
10.	Jammu &	-	-	-	Kashmir
11.	Jharkhand	-	-	1
12.	Karnataka -	11	4
13.	Kerala -	-	-
14.	Madhya 1	4	1	Pradesh
15.	Maharashta	7	9	3
16.	Manipur -	2	15
17.	Meghalaya -	-	-
18.	Mizoram -	-	-
19.	Nagaland -	-	-
20.	Orissa -	2	-
21.	Punjab	-	-	-
22.	Rajasthan -	-	-
23.	Sikkim -	-	-
24.	Tamilnadu 4	25	7
25.	Tripura -	3	-
26.	Uttar Pradesh 3	12	-
27.	Uttranchal 1	-	2
28.	West Bengal 8	30	8
29.	A& N Islands	-	-	-
30.	Chandigarh -	2	5
31.	NCT of Delhi -	3	-
32.	D&N.Haveli -	-	-
33.	Daman & Diu -	-	-
34.	Lakshdweep -	-	-
35.	Pondicherry. -	-	-	Total 56	174	9br>

GRANT- IN-AID SCHEME FOR COMBATING TRAFFICKING OF WOMEN & CHILDREN

DETAILS OF PROPOSALS RECEIVED AND SANCTIONED DURING 2002-03 TO 2004-05

( A ) TRAFFICKING OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN FOR COMMERCIAL SEXUAL EXPLOITATION
Name of the	No. of	No. of	No. of
State	proposals	proposals	proposals	2002-03	2003-04	2004-05
Rec. Sanc. Rec. Sanc. Rec. Sanc.
Andhra Pradesh 3 2 0 1 0 0 Assam 0 0 0 0 6 0 Chhatishgarh 0 0 0 0 2 0 Goa 1 0 0 0 0 0 Haryana 1 1 1 0 0 0 Karnataka 1 1 0 0 0 0 Maharashtra 11 1 7 0 4 5 Tamil Nadu 1 1 0 0 0 0 Uttar Pradesh 0 0 0 0 2 0 West Bengal 1 1 0 0 1 0 Delhi 1 1 0 0 0 0 Manipur 0 0 1 0 0 0 Pondicherry 1 1 0 0 0 0 TOTAL : 21 9 9 1 15 5

(B) INNOVATIVE PROJECTS FOR CHILD WELFARE
States	2002-03	2003-04	2004-05	Rec.	App.	Rec. App.	Rec. App.
Karnataka 1 1 - - - - Andhra Pradesh 3 1 - - - - Maharashtra 1 1 - - - 1 Assam - - 2 1 1 - Delhi - - 3 2 3 1 W.Bengal - - 2 - - - Orissa - - 1 - - - Manipur - - 4 - 6 - Tamil Nadu - - - - - 1 Total 5 3 12 3 10 3

Annexure – II

Department of Women and Child Development

Budget Estimates, Revised Estimates and Actual Expenditure for 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 for different Schemes.
(Rs. in Crores)
Sl. Scheme 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 No. BE RE Exp. BE RE Exp. BE RE Exp.
1 STEP 25.00 25.00 21.2 1 25.02 11.50 13.78 25.09 18.00 17.82
2 Swawlamban 25.00 25.00 24.50 25.00 20.00 19.35 25.00 25.00 7.18
3 Swadahr 15.00 10.00 4.04 15.00 1.00 1.12 3.00 3.99 4.21
4 Hostels for 15.00 8.00 6.00 10.00 5.00 5.14 10.00 7.00 4.82 Working women
5 (i) Short Stay 15.00 11.00 10.42 15.00 34.35 13.69 15.00 14.40 13.76 Homes (Plan) (ii)Short Stay 2.84 2.84 2.84 2.50 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 Homes (Non- Plan)
6. (i) Creches 12.00 8.00 8.00 20.00 8.00 6.03 30.00 16.92 10.49 (Plan) (ii) Creches 15.00 15.00 14.67 14.50 14.40 13.19 14.00 13.33 9.81 (Non – Plan)
7. Social Defence (i) Trafficking of Women and 1.50 1.10 0.49 1.50 0.55 0.47 4.00 0.80 0.37 Children for CommercialSexual Exploitation and (ii)Innovative Projects for Child Welfare