Question : REVENUE LOSS IN SEZS



(a) the cumulative revenue implications on account of the various concessions given to the Special Economic Zones (SEZs) between 2004-05 and 2009-10;

(b) whether the Government has directed the Central Board of Excise and Customs(CBEC) and Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to furnish a report on the possible violations by entities operating in SEZs;

(c) if so, whether CBEC and CBDT have submitted their reports to the Government;

(d) if so, the details thereof; and

(e) the action taken by the Government on the recommendations contained in the said report?

Answer given by the minister



FINANCE MINISTER (SHRI PRANAB MUKHERJEE)

(a) to (e) : A Statement is laid on the Table of the House.

Statement referred to in reply to parts (a) to (e) of LokSabha Starred Question No. 620 for answer on 18th May, 2012

(a): The revenue implications on account of various tax concessions are maintained in the form of the Revenue Foregone statement (“Revenue foregone under the Central Tax System”) in the Receipts Budget, which is a part of the Annual Budget. The estimates of revenue foregone on account of direct tax deductions given to the Special Economic Zones (SEZs) between 2004-05 to 2009-10 are as under:-


(Rs. In crore) Financial Year Revenue Foregone on SEZs 2004-05 1340 2005-06 6902 2006-07 866 2007-08 3000 2008-09 4466 2009-10 5518

The revenue foregone in Central Excise and Customs on account of SEZ Scheme between 2004-05 to 2009-10 are as under:

( Rs. In crore) Financial Year Central Customs Excise 2004-05 20.19 1057.12 2005-06 23.31 1047.49 2006-07 220.92 1642.35 2007-08 851.76 1803.95 2008-09 804.73 2324.29 2009-10 1547.04 3987.06

(b): In a meeting of the Economic Intelligence Council held on 28-2-2012, the issue of past violations by entities operating in SEZ was discussed, according to which the CBEC and CBDT were required to furnish a report on the findings and views of the Ministry of Commerce on the violations notified to them against the units operating in the SEZs.

(c): No, Madam.

(d) & (e): In viewof replyto part (c), questions do not arise.