MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE (SHRI NAMO NARAIN MEENA)
(a) & (b) The Government had constituted a Committee for evolving a
composite development index of States, under the Chairmanship of
Dr. Raghuram G. Rajan. The terms of reference of the Committee included;
(i) To suggest methods for identifying backward States on the basis of
measures such as the distance of the State from the national average on a
variety of criteria such as per capita income and other indicators of
human development;
(ii) To suggest any other method or criteria to determine the
backwardness of States;
(iii) To suggest the weightage to be given to each criterion;
(iv) To recommend how the suggested criteria may be reflected in future
planning and devolution of funds from the Central Government to the States.
(v) To suggest ways in which the absorptive capacity of States for funds
and their ability to use the funds to improve well-being can be assessed and
used to influence devolution to incentivise performance.
(c) The Committee submitted its Report in September 2013.
(d) The recommendations of the Committee are the following:
(i) The framework outlined in the Report be used to allocate some of the
development funds that are allocated by the Centre to the States.
(ii) The proposed underdevelopment index be updated on a quinquennial basis
and performance be measured relative to the last update.
(iii) The index and the allocation formula be re-examined after 10 years and
revisions proposed based on experience.
(iv) âLeast developedâ States, as identified by the index, be eligible for
other forms of Central support that the Central Government may deem necessary
to enhance the process of development.
(v) The approach recommended in the Report is not intended to replace all
existing methodologies, but should be thought of as one that will channel
some fund allocations based on need and performance. Other methodologies may
serve different purposes and should be used in parallel to allocate other funds.
The recommendations of the Report are being examined by the Government.
(e) Does not arise, in view of (c) above.