MINISTER OF LAW AND JUSTICE (Dr. M. VEERAPPA MOILY)
(a) & (b) The Supreme Court of India has intimated that a lawyer, Applicant
in-person, has on 15.09.2010, filed Interlocutory Application for impleadment as
a Respondent along with Application for permission to file information in sealed
cover in Petition (Criminal) No.10 of 2009 in LA. Nos. 1324, 1474 & 2134 of 2007
in W.P. (Civil) No. 202 of 1995 titled Amicus Curiae Vs. Prashant Bhusan,
Advocate & Anr., which is sub-judice.
(c) to (f) The existing procedure for appointment of Judges of the Supreme
Court and the High Courts is based on the Supreme Court Judgment dated October 6,
1993 in the case of Supreme Court Advocates on Record & Anr. Vs. Union of India,
and the Advisory- Opinion of the Supreme Court dated October 28, 1998, The procedure
has been debated in various fora and there have been demands to change the same.
However, there is, at present, no specific proposal to bring about any change in
the present system of appointment of Judges in the Supreme Court and the High Courts.
(g) & (h) To ensure greater accountability and transparency in the higher
judiciary, the Government is bringing in a Bill titled `The Judicial Standards
and Accountability Bill, 2010` which incorporates a mechanism for enquiring into
complaints against the Judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts, enabling
declaration of assets and liabilities of Judges and laying down judicial standards
to be followed by the Judges, in the current Session of the Parliament.