THE MINISTER OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION ( SHRI SHANTA KUMAR )
(a),(b),(c), (d), (e) & (f) : A statement is laid on the Table of the House.
STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PARTS (a), (b), (c), (d),(e) & (f) OF STARRED QUESTION
NO. 186 FOR ANSWER IN THE LOK SABHA ON 09.03.2001.
(a) The production of sugar in private and public sectors in the country during the
last three sugar seasons (October-September) was as under:-
(Figures in lakh tonnes)
Sugar Season Private Sector Public Sector 1997-98 49.71 8.86 1998-99(P) 57.64 8.81 1999-2000(P) 69.46 9.97
(b) & (c) : Available information in regard to the sugar mills for which revival is
pending with the BIFR and the outstanding dues of sugarcane growers pending against the
said mills is given below:-
(Rs. In lakhs)
Name of the Mill Outstanding cane price dues upto 1999-2000 sugar season
(1)UTTAR PRADESH
(i)Lakshmi Sugar Mills 620.75
(ii)Khalilabad Sugar Mills Pvt. Ltd. 508.65
(iii)Saraya Sugar Mills Ltd. 2291.23
(iv)Cawnpore Sugar Works Ltd. 1959.82
(2)MADHYA PRADESH
B.S.I. Ltd. 236.38
(3)ORISSA
Western Orissa Sugar Ltd. 36.98
(4)RAJASTHAN
Mewar Sugar 168.80
(d) Accumulation of cane price arrears could be attributed to a number of factors, such
as poor financial position of sugar mills, high cost of production, excessively high State
Advised Cane Prices, inadequate sales realisation, mills remaining closed, etc.
(e) & (f) : The BIFR prepares revival package for mills including repayment of the
outstanding dues of cane growers in consultation with the concerned State Governments/Central
Government, Banks, etc.