Question : CONTRACT FARMING SYSTEM



(a) whether the Government is aware of the contract farming system being practiced in certain States;

(b) if so, the States which have adopted this system and nature of contract farming in these States;

(c) whether in many cases the contracts are tended to be biased in favour of the promoter companies and they are reluctant to share with grower`s the risk of crop failure even if it is caused by faulty seeds or technology provided by them;

(d) if so, the details thereof and the Government`s view on adoption of contract farming system; and

(e) the steps proposed to be taken to safeguard the interests of the farmers involved in the contract farming?

Answer given by the minister



MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE (SHRI KANTI LAL BHURIA)

(a): Contract farming has been prevalent in various parts of the country for commercial crops like sugarcane, cotton, tea, coffee, etc. The concept has, however, gained importance in recent times in the wake of economic liberalization. The main feature of contract farming is that farmers grow selected crops under a buy back agreement with an agency engaged in trading or processing.

(b) The State Governments of Madhya Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Sikkim, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Nagaland have provided legal support to contract farming by making provision for it under the State Agricultural Produce Marketing Regulation Act (APMC Act). Nature of contract farming depends on the crops the objectives and resources of the buying company and the experience of the farmers. These agreements can be in the nature of pre- harvest agreement that bind the firm and the grower for the sale of the crop on specified price. The agreement may also require the buyers to supply crop inputs, extension or credit in exchange for the marketing agreement.

(c)to(e): Small farmers in India are generally capital starved and cannot make major investment in land improvement and modern inputs. Contract farming can fill up this gap by providing the farmers with quality inputs, technical guidance and management skills and most importantly link them to assured and profitable markets. In view of above, contract-farming arrangements are supported by the Government as a measure of reform in agricultural marketing sector. While doing so, Government has sought to protect the interest of both the farmers as well as the industry equitably, by suggesting arrangement for registration of sponsoring companies and recording of contract farming agreements, in order to check unreliable and spurious companies. A dispute resolution mechanism is also suggested to be set up near to farmers which can quickly settle issues, if any, arising between the farmers and the company under a quasi-judicial manner. The farmers while raising the contracted crops, run the risk of incurring debt and consequent displacement from land in the event of crop failure. Farmers have to be indemnified from such displacement by law. A model APMC Act inter-alia containing provisions to the said effect has been circulated to State Government/Union Territories for adopting as the subject matter falls within their jurisdiction.