MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE (GINGEE N. RAMACHANDRAN)
(a) Yes, Sir.
(b) The Income Tax Department, Mumbai conducted survey
of 2 cable operators wherein it was found that they had
not maintained books of accounts properly. Cash of
Rs. 70,350/- was found in the case of one assessee.
In the second case, as a result of discrepancy found
during survey, the assessee offered to pay income tax of
Rs. 60,000/- for the financial year 2002-03.
(c) Details of cable customers in Mumbai are not available.
(d) For the year ending 31.03.2003 service tax of
Rs. 111.53 lakh, has been paid by the cable operators
in Mumbai. Details of income tax paid by cable operators in
Mumbai are, however, not maintained by the Income Tax
Department. As per Entry 62 of the State List of the 7th
Schedule of the Constitution of India, tax on entertainment
is a State subject. Hence, the Central Government does not
maintain any details in this regard.
(e) Under section 66 of the Finance Act 1994 service tax is
leviable. Non-payment of service tax is not a cognisable
offence under this Act.
(f) Does not arise.