MINISTER OF RAILWAYS ( KUMARI MAMATA BANERJEE )
(a) to (h) A statement is laid on the Table of the Sabha.
Statement referred to in reply to parts (a) to (h) of Starred Question No.216 by Shri Haribhau Shankar Mahale to be answered in Lok Sabha on 09.03.2000 regarding Economic Viability of B.O.T.
(a) Yes, Sir.
(b) The calculated Rate of Return based on traffic projection in the survey report was L 15.58%. However, in the first year of operation i.e. 1997-98, the KRCL incurred a loss - ofRs.153.64 crs.
(c) The RITES report on the traffic potential of the line had indicated that 40% of the freight. traffic expected to move on Konkan Railway during the first couple of years of operation was to be the diverted traffic from the IndIan Railways.
(d) The actual traffic which can be diverted depends on the total offering of traffic South route the capacity of the alternative Indian Railway section and the originating station etc. Owing to lesser offering of traffic so far, due to production centers, diversion of the projected level of traffic to Konkan Railway materialized.
(e) Yes, Sir.
(f) Yes, Sir. However, while Konkan Railway Corporation expenditure from earnings, due to high financing cost on market borrowings, there is an overall loss.
(g) The total loss to the Konkan Railway in the first year of operation has already been indicated in reply to para (b) above. In 1998-99 the total loss was Rs.340.3 crs
(h) New concepts in services like Ro-Ro (Roll-on, roll oft) for moving loaded trucks on rail and offering (itation to station rates, wherever possible, to attract traffic have been taken. Aggressive marketing strategy has been launched by contacting local industries on the Konkan Railway route for attracting more traffic on the system.